Other People’s Ideas

And when I say “Other”, I really mean “OTHER.” Remember the Doomsday Prophet of Religion I mentioned in my last article? Well, this is the part where I explain myself. Upon entering the campus yesterday, I picked up a flier from a ranting old codger who held a sign I didn’t read up in the air. Typical Doomsday Prophet type. Nevertheless, I read the flier he was handing out from “People’s Ideas” and wondered to myself what the heck kind of people read this junk.

Here’s what the flier had to say. As usual, my comments are non-italicized words.

PSYCHOCRATS NEED WARS

Those who deal with people as a professional way of life, whose religion is psychology, are the leading aspect of the ruling class even when they see themselves as being used by the big money people. Recently, many of these types of professionals have acquired big money even though accumulating riches was not their initial goal.

When it comes to certain political issues, the psychocrats and promoters of older religions such as Christianity, Judaism, etc, are sometimes bitterly at odds with each other. Nevertheless they are married as one, each dependent upon the existence of the other for their survival.

The problem as I see it so far is that the old man shouting on the sidewalk in the manner that I previously described is referring to the people of my religion and every other major religion as psycho – or actually “psychocrat” which isn’t even a word. I acknowledge that he could be referring to the term “psychology,” but in context, it doesn’t seem like he exactly means that.

The psychocrats are not so conscious of their interdependence with the likes of George W. Bush and millions of his supporters, but this current invasion and occupation of iraq could not exist if it were not for so many American soldiers with a strong God-belief. If our soldiers lacked this strong God-belief, our military would fall apart from within. Religions need and maintain wars.

Seems all right except for one part that seems rather skewed. He’s stating that religions need wars, like it’s automatically inherent that war is an evil thing. So how to get rid of war, in this perfect version of the world that he invisions? By getting rid of religion, of course:

Because the sons and daughters of the psychocrats usually lack that strong God-belief, it is rare to find them willing to kill and to risk their lives for the power of the nation. Thus, it is easy to understand why Bush would not institute a draft to man his wars, despite the fact that many thought our president would implement it.

You hear that folks? We don’t need a draft because we have enough faith to go around and a strong sense of patriotism! Alright!

Yet the non-productive way of live of the psychocrats could not exist for so many millions of Americans if we did not dominate the world. That is why the psychocrats and the older religions are married as one because neither could exist except alongside the other.

I’m sorry, but people don’t get to high places by being NON-productive. Being productive implies that the producer has a tendency towards producing, generating and creating. Throughout history, no institution has ever gone into place without being productive. It’s either be productive or die out. Even the most despicable institutions ever created, i.e. Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, Napoleon’s empire, could be classified as productive, with the obvious exception of morality in the equation. That’s how imperialism comes along, though.

This understanding places President Bush as smarter on this issue than the elitist left who see him as stupid. Although Bush may not think of America as an imperialist nation, his God belief enables him to believe that American domination is a good thing for the world. We desire that our nation play a leadership role, but Bush’s dream of American imperialism being necessary for a free world reveals social ignorance.

Oh, so now America is an Imperialist nation. Well let’s just see what the definition of imperialism is according to Dictionary.com, shall we?

Imperialism: The policy of extending the rule or authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies.

So in other words, we need to have absolute control over other countries to be running an empire. I guess then that’s why the United Nations decided to support us in the Iraq war from the start without batting an eyelid, right? Wrong. We HAVE no absolute control over other countries. That, and imperialist nations throughout history have tendencies to either execute or deport their own citizens for speaking out against them. Alright then, back to our regularly scheduled lunacy:

The president also reveals his social ignorance in his efforts to gain a hired Arab army to control the Arab world. It seems the resistors to Bush’s dream also have God-belief and are more willing than the occupiers to give their life to defend their religion.

We cannot kill and maim all of the resistors, and the more our soldiers and the puppet soldiers make moves to tighten their grip on the resistors, the more resistors they will create. That in effect is what Saddam was telling Bush and his supporters long before they decided to invade and occupy Iraq.

In this war, there are two kinds of people, folks. Two kinds of people fighting this thing. The first kind is the kind who kill so that they can get into heaven and please Allah for slaying the infidels, and the guys who are trying to defend their country from those who think that. And a good percentage of those who are of the defending type just so happen to believe in God. Which religion is the problem? According to this guy, both. According to me, just one.

Saddam did not ask to be captured, jailed, and tried in a puppet court, but he knew that his cause would not die with him. He too put his life on the line to serve his cause, and it is working out similar to the warnings he gave Bush. In regards to the results of the American invasion of Iraq, it turns out that Saddam was wiser than Bush.

He’s completely gone from reality at this point. He’s actually talking about Saddam Hussein like the guy had a cause worth dying for. And to top it off, he ends with saying that the fascist is smarter than the imperialist. Don’t believe me? Well, if you continue along that line, that’s the kind of conclusion that this guy would have to come up with.

If the Arab people did not resist imperialism , their unity as a people and the religion that keeps them together would die. In the Arab world, like in the American world, the majority seeks only peace. In elite class society, however, the majority never makes the important decisions for power and therefore the liberty of the whole group.

What Bush fails to tell the people is that the resistors have extensive support from their people and that support will not stop. The support for Bush and the imperialist wars will also not go away partly because the way of life of the leaders of all political parties in the U.S. need those wars to maintain their professional ways of life. Those leaders are obligated to maintain the non-productive professional ways of life of about one hundred million employed Americans and a high percentage of our youth also seek those non-productive professional ways of life.

I guess then Bush is just so professional and non-productive then. He’s professional at being non-productive. Same goes for all politicians. All politicians are good for nothing. And this guy wants people to take him seriously.

No political party is an exception to this rule. Let us come together to make conditions in which such a political party will, in the future, arise.

I would LOVE to see this guy try to make a political party that never fights any wars whatsoever just to see how long it lasts.

Many of those who now do not even bother to vote will be in the vanguard of such a political party. Unlike Stan Roberts or John Tuvo, they cannot yet conceive of resolution to the class distinction. Most falsely believe that class opportunism is human nature even if it is not their own nature.

The Bible implies that the organization of the productive people for their own collective power can not stop the wars. The purpose of that is for the preaching class to maintain their nonproductive professional ways of life. If class opportunism were human nature, the effort to stop wars would be foolish and the Bible would be correct.

Class opportunism is not human nature, although it is practiced by a large percentage of the people. This is especially true in this nation because the opportunity is so great.

The things the Bible says in particular to human nature being opportunistic and violent, says it in order that the productive people remain meek, and that we should look to the teaching of the non-productive with faith and obedience.

Here’s one thing you need to know about the class system before you continue reading. The class system exists to show who works hard and who doesn’t. That’s one of the important factors. If someone has worked his way up the ladder, he’s productive and worked hard to where he got to. If someone doesn’t have a job and spends his time in his parent’s house blogging about a flier some yahoo on the street was giving out, that’s not being very productive. The sacrifices I make for you people.

For a successful anti-war movement, a need exists that productive people come together to lead and not to follow the teaching of nonproductive people who lead the current organizations.

To be against violence is not enough. We must begin to dwell upon the class distinction. That is the thing that war and other violence is an inevitable consqequence of.

Translation: In order to have a successful anti-war movement, we need to throw another wrench in the works and effectively break something that was working. Like having an anti-war movement doesn’t throw a wrench in the works already.

The class distinction does not begin with personal wealth. It begins and ends with the division of the other people into two groups. One class deals with the people as a professional way of life. The other class produces and services the primary needs for the survival of the people as a professional way of life. Although this distinction is clear, a large percentage of American have a dual class nature and confuse the issue because some of such people claim to be classless while identifying more with the non-productive part of their practice that with the productive part.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the pathetic lack of common sense that parades the streets of San Francisco. Sad.